Abstract
Egypt is known as a state defined by its highly centralised model of governance. This paper explores the role of decentralization within this framework, examining both historical and contemporary approaches to power-sharing. The paper highlights certain examples, such as the United Arab Republic, a brief period of integration with Syria whose failure deepened suspicions about decentralisation. However, the government’s resistance to any substantial power-sharing led to growing citizen discontent over time, culminating in the 2011 uprising. Actors in the revolution emphasised the need for reform and decentralisation, reigniting the debate on the implementation of decentralized structures. This study examines specific factors that have hindered these changes. In the final section, the paper identifies necessary reforms within the state, drawing on examples from scholars in the field. While decentralization is not presented as a panacea, its principles offer valuable insights that could help mitigate Egypt’s evolving political landscape.